© 2017 Living Computing Project.

Sponsored by National Science Foundation’s Expeditions in Computing Program

(Awards #1522074 / 1521925 / 1521759).

Please reload

Recent Posts

Relative Fluorescent Units Considered Harmful

September 11, 2016

My working title for the paper that will come from this year’s iGEM interlab study is “Relative Fluorescent Units Considered Harmful.”  It’s a bit of a playful title, invoking a computer science tradition started by the notorious Edsger Dijkstra. I think, however, that this statement is deserved and also that we can now back it up with some hard experimental evidence.

 

Most of the data is in—I’m just waiting for a few more teams with extensions—and it looks like we’ve got amazing results.  The big news is, in a more positive reformulation of my title, that calibrating fluorescence measurements works, and that it makes a big enough difference to be worth it.  Let me present the key conclusions that I believe we can now support in the form of responses to the most common arguments that I hear against calibrating fluorescent measurements.

 

Read Beal's full blog post here.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

NEWS